Quote:
Originally Posted by Davescamaro
Both of you are hilarious with your ecm 2 cents worth which is great info, but overkill. The poor guy who started this thread wanted nothing more than 20 more reliable hp in which true fact, comes standard in any 6.2L platform. Thr fact you two drive an argument over engineering fact that this 2.0 turbo came as an option only in the later 2016 production cars and was previously an ATS motor for us less affordable guys. I simply bought it as a turbo car sedan option and see the faster way of gaining hp and tq than the v6 option weighs in that your pushing limits too far than what we can get. Fact: fastest recorded 2.0 ltg camaro is pushing 10s in the 1/4 while we're getting our hands dusted by i4's by honda and other competitors is a shame. We have limited resources due to the fact we don't have accessible resources as the 6.2 cause they don't have a huge demand for it.
400hp or less is quite remarkable for an i4 daily driven. Technology is great, but look at your front case cover, see an oil seep at it that gm knows about it and won't do a thing?
|
What EXACTLY does this statement mean? .......... "Both of you are hilarious with your ecm 2 cents worth which is great info, but overkillll" ??...