Thread: SPL Toe Arms
View Single Post
Old 11-11-2020, 04:51 PM   #23
Msquared

 
Msquared's Avatar
 
Drives: Chevrolet SS 1LE
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 1,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by kropscamaro16 View Post
turner told me this would be next



The front lower control arms would be great because you would be able to fix your roll center after being lowered. The tension rod would compliment that well, as you would be eliminating the big bushing up front and getting camber and castor



what do you guys think?


https://www.splparts.com/products/front-lower-control-arms-chevrolet-camaro-gen6.html


https://www.splparts.com/products/front-tension-rods-chevrolet-camaro-gen6.html
It will definitely do those things. I can't imagine you'd need more camber than is available with the stock parts and a Vorshlag camber plate. Or you could keep stock camber plates and just go with these. Those spacers can adjust for RC. I don't know how necessary that is, even if your car is lowered. You'd have to see what the front-view geometry looks like before and after and decide if it's important. My only concern would be the increased loads on the big cap screw that serves at the ball joint pedestal on these, but one assumes that SPL has done due engineering diligence on that. Last thing: these are expensive at $1300 for the two parts, and they probably won't do much to improve measurable performance. I'd want to make sure I've done all the other things that provide better bang for the buck first.
__________________
Matt Miller
2020 SS 1LE
Msquared is offline   Reply With Quote