View Single Post
Old 07-17-2019, 01:39 PM   #31
toohighpsi
 
Drives: 2015 C7 Z06 M7
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 654
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
I just don't care for the torque that it gives up for a street car. Sure at WOT above 5k rpm it definitely makes more steam, but when you are part throttle torqueing the engine through the gears I don't see an advantage here. Midrange is very important imo for a street car. If only this unit was keeping the torque up around 570 avg while still pulling 600whp.

Sorry for my delay and not providing this plot initially, the 2650 make more torque everywhere on the base LT1 than the TVS2300 did, as you know, every dyno is different so here are all 3 runs on the same dyno plotted together.

Stock Camaro LT1 (417 RWHP)
TVS2300 Camaro LT1 with Magnuson CARB Cal (553 RWHP)
TVS2650 Camaro LT1 with CARB Proposed Cal (600 RWHP)

As you can see it gives a nice torque benefit across the range and then keeps pulling up top.

Name:  All Runs TVS Camaro.png
Views: 2878
Size:  79.0 KB

Now there is no question that the 2300 is a great performer and lower cost solution than the 2650, but in this scenario (street driven pump gas car), the 2650 doesn't give up anything down low and still has a much higher peak power capability.
toohighpsi is offline   Reply With Quote