CAMARO6 - View Single Post - Autocross Videos

clyde · 10-09-2021, 01:48 PM

FWIW, it seems like there are some production tolerances with significant effect on rear alignment range. Some cars can get a few more tenths camber than -2.0 while keeping a total .1 (or more toe in at the rear while some can't get -2.0 camber with 0 toe. I could get a little more of both than I have, but it was where I wanted to start...and was happy enough to stick with it.

On tires, I'm not sure the size difference from OE matters as much to the computers as much as the percentage difference between F/R diameters. The 305/315 RT660s are pretty close to OE and we've found the computers *seem* happy enough to not get much hard pedal or unpredictable eLSD behavior. When we've had 305 RE71s all around on or I've played with the 285 Michelin all seasons all around I use for winters and poor man's rain tires, there's been a lot more hard pedal and less consistent eLSD.

10-09-2021, 01:48 PM	#888
clyde Drives: broken Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: DC Posts: 186	FWIW, it seems like there are some production tolerances with significant effect on rear alignment range. Some cars can get a few more tenths camber than -2.0 while keeping a total .1 (or more toe in at the rear while some can't get -2.0 camber with 0 toe. I could get a little more of both than I have, but it was where I wanted to start...and was happy enough to stick with it. On tires, I'm not sure the size difference from OE matters as much to the computers as much as the percentage difference between F/R diameters. The 305/315 RT660s are pretty close to OE and we've found the computers seem happy enough to not get much hard pedal or unpredictable eLSD behavior. When we've had 305 RE71s all around on or I've played with the 285 Michelin all seasons all around I use for winters and poor man's rain tires, there's been a lot more hard pedal and less consistent eLSD. __________________ clyde Team WTF?! what are you gonna do? :dunno: