Quote:
Originally Posted by toohighpsi
Sorry for my delay and not providing this plot initially, the 2650 make more torque everywhere on the base LT1 than the TVS2300 did, as you know, every dyno is different so here are all 3 runs on the same dyno plotted together.
Stock Camaro LT1 (417 RWHP)
TVS2300 Camaro LT1 with Magnuson CARB Cal (553 RWHP)
TVS2650 Camaro LT1 with CARB Proposed Cal (600 RWHP)
As you can see it gives a nice torque benefit across the range and then keeps pulling up top.
Attachment 996315
Now there is no question that the 2300 is a great performer and lower cost solution than the 2650, but in this scenario (street driven pump gas car), the 2650 doesn't give up anything down low and still has a much higher peak power capability. |
Mike, Thanks for posting that. Paints a much clearer picture. The torque looks low on both units. So I am not sure if that is Dyno or tuning related but none the less it at least shows the 2650 gives up nothing down low and nets a much stronger top end. In that case it's a win win.
Just curious if they both were dyno'd at the same boost level?
Quote:
Originally Posted by radz28
And you are also coming across argumentative and hostile. Some people have preferences others don't. The topic is the 2650 install. There was and is not a lot of information to compare to. Frankly - the way you came into this thread seemed more confrontational than anything. Maybe I'm wrong, but it looks like you and laynlo15 have history already, which is what let me to these possibilities. If that's what it is, stay closer to topic.
|
Not Hostile at all. Laynlo and I are cool... No issues at all. I have been a fan of the Magnuson stuff from day 1.