Quote:
Originally Posted by toohighpsi
Sorry for my delay and not providing this plot initially, the 2650 make more torque everywhere on the base LT1 than the TVS2300 did, as you know, every dyno is different so here are all 3 runs on the same dyno plotted together.
Stock Camaro LT1 (417 RWHP)
TVS2300 Camaro LT1 with Magnuson CARB Cal (553 RWHP)
TVS2650 Camaro LT1 with CARB Proposed Cal (600 RWHP)
As you can see it gives a nice torque benefit across the range and then keeps pulling up top.
Attachment 996315
Now there is no question that the 2300 is a great performer and lower cost solution than the 2650, but in this scenario (street driven pump gas car), the 2650 doesn't give up anything down low and still has a much higher peak power capability. |
Is the 2300 in this graph intercooled and otherwise the car is stock? Is Mike Jrs car an A8? I ask because I'm interested in just an intercooled supercharger on my otherwise stock car. I like the Magnuson, just trying to decide between TVS2300 and TVS2650.