View Single Post
Old 12-03-2017, 04:52 PM   #23
Zeke.Malvo

 
Zeke.Malvo's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selo View Post
FCA has a problem on their hands. The Challenger is a huge success pretty much based on cosmetics alone. The ride is pretty generic - once driving it could just as well be a Chrysler 300 or a Charger. It would be like having a Camaro that drove just like a Malibu. So what the hell do they do with a refresh? If it doesn't still look exactly like an old Challenger, it loses 90% of it's.buyers. But if they leave it the same, well, they can't. It's old, heavy, and gets bad mileage. And after 12 years I'd guess most everybody who wants one will have gotten one. Then again, it worked for Porsche 911 for quite awhile too.......
So are you saying if Dodge came out with an all new revolutionary Challenger, it would only sell 385 units or so a month? That's only about 4500 cars in a year. Interesting.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtq
T56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear
Zeke.Malvo is offline   Reply With Quote