|
If you can't see what having 2-weeks worth of experience with essentially an all new combination in the GT vs 2-years trial and error with the present Camaro , i don't know what else to say.
Funny you mention this 121-mph pass, given the Camaro average is roughly 115-mph there is no reason to doubt the results right? According to others in the forum poor traction results in high mph, how did this SS run that mph, it obviously hooked?
If the GT cranks out a 121-mph pass claiming to be stock what will this forum's reaction then be?
This is the way I see it now, this Mustang is faster than anyone in this forum ever expected it to be, including myself. The excuses are starting. We have only 2-weeks of testing, including dyno runs up to 430-rwhp, and 1/4 mph to 119. Nobody expected that, not even the Mustang crowd.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
|