[FastCarFanBoy]

Originally Posted by BlaqWhole

Wrong again. Many sources were reporting low to mid 13s in the 370Z.



At least I can admit that the GT was faster than the SS from 11-14. You're delusional, arrogant, and too ignorant to admit that the GT has been getting it's ass kicked for a long timeits been 2 model years...the Camaro was getting beat or just plain didnt exist becuase it was such a POS for 10 of the previous 11 years. . When the GT was faster than the Camaro, it was by 2 tenths which makes it a driver's race. Any other time since 1994because '85-93 the Mustang was faster the GT against any V8 Camaro was a complete and utter failure. When the Z28s were running mid-high 13s to low 14s in the mid 90s the GT was running 15s. Then when the New Edge finally got into the low 14s in 1999 with that PI 2V garbage the V8 Camaros were running mid 13s. When the SS came back in 2010 it was a 13 flat to the GT's mid-high 13 in that 3V garbage. The Coyote came back and it was barely ahead. The the Camaro upped the ante again and was beating the GT by nearly a full second for the past 2 years. Point is in the few years that the GT was faster it was by a small margin. And that was for only 4 years. Yet the vast majority of the past 2 decades the Camaro has been completely obliterating the GT.its a back and forth battle
Look at this. 2001 Mustang GT...14.7 quarter mile
http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars...rd-mustang-gt/

2002 Honda Accord EX coupe...14.5 quarter mile
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...-v-6-road-test

How the hell is a Honda Accord faster than a Mustang GT in the same years?? LOL!!early mod motors were turds thats how

edit