Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy
Cool the Nismo went 13.3(Havent seen that instrumented test and no other Mag could duplicate)
|
Wrong again. Many sources were reporting low to mid 13s in the 370Z.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy
cooler is the fact that in several of those years where Nismo boi's were clowning Mustangs with their 13.3-13.6 cars the Mustang was faster than the Camaro.
|
At least I can admit that the GT was faster than the SS from 11-14. You're delusional, arrogant, and too ignorant to admit that the GT has been getting it's ass kicked for a long time. When the GT was faster than the Camaro, it was by 2 tenths which makes it a driver's race. Any other time since 1994 the GT against any V8 Camaro was a complete and utter failure. When the Z28s were running mid-high 13s to low 14s in the mid 90s the GT was running 15s. Then when the New Edge finally got into the low 14s in 1999 with that PI 2V garbage the V8 Camaros were running mid 13s. When the SS came back in 2010 it was a 13 flat to the GT's mid-high 13 in that 3V garbage. The Coyote came back and it was barely ahead. The the Camaro upped the ante again and was beating the GT by nearly a full second for the past 2 years. Point is in the few years that the GT was faster it was by a small margin. And that was for only 4 years. Yet the vast majority of the past 2 decades the Camaro has been completely obliterating the GT.
Look at this. 2001 Mustang GT...14.7 quarter mile
http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars...rd-mustang-gt/
2002 Honda Accord EX coupe...14.5 quarter mile
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...-v-6-road-test
How the hell is a Honda Accord faster than a Mustang GT in the same years?? LOL!!