Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy
trying to parse your nonsense is like having a conversation about nuclear medicine with someone who has tourettes.
lets try to at least compare cars from the same model yea.r
3000gt's and ZX's were around for years before the SS showed up.
early 90's MR2 turbo was an even match for a Camaro
LT-1 vettes were high 13.'s ...Supra was faster
your Motortrend link shows the S550 .5 and 5mph faster than the Nismo...is that a drivers race now?
the ZR1 was .5 faster than a Supra and cost $67,000 in 1993 LOL. Supra was $40k
...this is all irrelevant of course
|
You don't know anything about cars in general. And you know much less about cars in the era you're talking about. And every time you say something I wonder just how much more nonsense you can pack on and you seem to have an endless supply.
Regardless of what misinformation you think you have, the 3000GT came out while the 3rd Gen TPI IROCs were still in production and were outgoing. So of course the 3000 GT would be faster. Plus the 3000GT was like $40K back then and was a V6 TT with AWD and was one of the best imports around at the time. So saying it was faster than a 5.7 TPI 3rd Gen Camaro Z28 just shows how idiotic your argument is. And using that argument to justify the Mustang GT getting beat by 350Zs and 370Zs shows even more idiocy. Once the 4th Gen Z28 came out the Camaro closed the gap. When the Z28 SS came out in 96 the Camaro was in the 13s and keeping up with the 3000GTs and Supras. Even the non-SS version of the Z28 was in the high 13s. What was the GT running at the time? High 14s to low 15s. In fact, the damn Honda Prelude was running at least the same time as the GT if not faster in the 90s. LOL!! And even worse than that, there were some Honda Accords that were faster than some of the New Edge Mustang GTs by a tenth of a second, lol!! So in the 90s the Mustang GT was keeping up with the Prelude and in the 2000s it was getting beat by the Accord. What kind of shit is that?? And you're comparing the Camaro to the Supra and 3000GT VR4?? How can you even defend or justify your BS??
The Supra ran low 13s in their time. 13.3-13.5. That was in the 94-97 years. The LT1 Vette in those same years was running the same times, low to mid 13s. They were always within 2 tenths of each other. So where you got your information is beyond me. Must be more of that made up Mustang BS you Mustang boys like to invent.
And learn to read...you said
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy
the 370z Nismo has never been a low 13 car when tested by your criteria.
|
The link I posted clearly says "We’ve tested eight other 370Z models, including two convertibles and two NISMO models, since it arrived for the 2009 model year. In testing, past models reached 60 mph in 4.7–5.1 seconds and ran the quarter mile in 13.3–13.6 seconds at 102.9–107.2 mph." You can't even keep up with an argument.