Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/nissa...t-test-review/
MT, 370Z, tested 13.3-13.6.
And I didn't say the SS did a 12.2. I said it is in the 12.2 range. Which it is since Hotrod magazine pulled off a 12.21 and MT did a 12.3 while others did 12.4. Try paying attention and a little bit of reading comprehension.
And no, the 3000GT and 300ZXs did not beat the Z28 SS. They were neck and neck in the mid 13s. Guess which car wasn't even close to that. Right, the Mustang GT. And for the record, the 3000GT, Supras, and 300ZXs were the best that the imports had to offer and were up there in performance pushing 300 hp or more with TT V6s. The Z28 SS was keeping up with them with the 5.7 NA LS1 engine. What did the GT have? Ah, a 4.6 SOHC NPI engine making 225 hp and running a mid to high 14. Lame.
And the Supra NEVER "raped" a Vette. Bone stock the Supra was a low 13. Guess what the LT1 powered Corvette was running. Low 13s. Oh, and what about the mid 90s ZR1 Vette? That was running a 12.9 and the only car that could touch it in the same price range or cheaper was the Viper. So you really have no idea what you're talking about. Supras, 300ZXs, 3000GTs, and even the Skyline (with exception of the R32 or whatever it is called) were not beating GM. They were kicking Ford's ass all over the place but not GM.
|
trying to parse your nonsense is like having a conversation about nuclear medicine with someone who has tourettes.
lets try to at least compare cars from the same model yea.r
3000gt's and ZX's were around for years before the SS showed up.
early 90's MR2 turbo was an even match for a Camaro
LT-1 vettes were high 13.'s ...Supra was faster
your Motortrend link shows the S550 .5 and 5mph faster than the Nismo...is that a drivers race now?
the ZR1 was .5 faster than a Supra and cost $67,000 in 1993 LOL. Supra was $40k
...this is all irrelevant of course