Quote:
Originally Posted by 1slowssm6
Calling me a kid just makes you look like an ahole,assuming that I think I'm an expert is also wrong, but to each his own,I wasnt attacking you in any way at all,I was arguing the point that you didn't state da's,didn't state a mph diff,also didn't have identical or even close 60fts,tryna make the comparison is hard having none of those things available to us,might not need my comments but you posted the question,left out details,this is what you get but have a great day bud  |
Thanks appreciate your opinion , but the only way I could possibly have had side by side comparison is if I would have done the track testing same day I didn't but car that has gone to the track several times and ran 12.1 to 12.3 every time throughout the year with different weather conditions each time to only make one change and go run almost a full second slower only leads me to believe it was the 1 change that had something to do with it. Now I agree it seems like a huge loss for just the 1 change (CAI) but it is what it is and as for 60's, 330', 660', 1000' & 1/4 yes the times are drastically different that being my point if it would 60' the same it would run close to the same I lost most ET in the 60' that's all I have to go off this was my reason for asking for input.
I apologize for offending you only here in common interest and to stay informed and pass on anything I learn as you can imagine very upset with the huge difference in ET.