View Single Post
Old 06-08-2017, 01:51 AM   #29
IMadeYouReadThis

 
IMadeYouReadThis's Avatar
 
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tremek View Post
If you care about quarter mile times and/or are drag racing, a GT (or an SS) becomes a 10-second car with $5-10k additional into either one. Any of the lesser Camaros or Mustangs? Nope.

Re: a track day car, I bet a 1LE V6 is a blast. For driving on the street though, that V6 has to rev all the way to its redline to make sufficient power:



That's pretty anemic when compared to a LT1:





Off-idle, the 6.2 is making more than 130 ft/lbs torque more than the V6's peak...

What about the 5.0 Coyote?


Even off idle the little 5.0 is 50 ft/lbs above the LGX's peak and by 3500rpm is at least 100 ft/lbs over it.

I myself live at altitude and torque (or the lack thereof) is that much more noticeable. Torque alone would be the reason to go with the V8 for me, but I also recognize that the V6 Camaro's performance is far better than it's ever been. Just still not enough for me.


you realize the Camaro is also lighter right. you also realize the challenger hemi rt does 0 60 is 5.1 mustang gt 4.6 as well right? 95 percent of guys do not track their cars so all that matters to those guys is 0 60. whats the 0 to 60 of your wagon stock? 4 seconds? how much was it new? 2 or 3 times more then my car? 5 seconds to 60 is good enough for me. and back to the original post I could have gotten a base gt or rt for the price I payed. my car is better then those options. If money was no object and buying a SS then dropping 5 to 10k in to it like you posted then I would but unfortunately I am a blue collar factory worker and bought the working mans Camaro.

Last edited by IMadeYouReadThis; 06-08-2017 at 02:11 AM.
IMadeYouReadThis is offline   Reply With Quote