05-25-2017, 12:57 PM
|
#361
|
Drives: 66 Chevelle SS
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,347
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustang Fanboy
Exactly right, most of us don't want to scour the country for a deal.
Worded from a true Camaro Fanboy.
The GT is a tune and CAI away from matching the SS in straight line performance. Ford has relied heavily on the aftermarket to fill in the gaps….something every mustang owner fully understands. We purchase our vehicles not because they are the fastest, but because we prefer the styling, the ergonomics, the visibility etc. If I wanted to be the fastest on the block, I would still have several of my old fox bodies.
Also, correct me if I’m wrong…but the SS 1LE has never been tested against a GT350 or a GT350R. Some of you seem to think that simply because some of these times posted are close that they are equal in performance. Different track and weather conditions can easily add or shed 3 seconds to a lap time.
The funny thing is here, more people prefer the mustang and it’s inferior performance over the camaro….and nearly always have. You seem to think that performance is everything, and for most people that simply isn’t true.
You do also realize that the GT350R just was within spitting distance to a chassis you all claim is light years superior to the S550….and did so despite an absolutely enormous disparity in horsepower and torque.
One thing I can say for certain. Many of you can’t stand that the GT350R is considered a “special” vehicle by all media and collectors…so much so that it’s still being chosen when pit against Chevy’s upper echelon.
And Ford still hasn’t gotten to the real competition of the ZL1 yet…The GT500!
|
MT or Import Trend is hardly a magazine. I've had this opinion for years. I wouldn't waste a nickel on that import ad book.
__________________
66 Chevelle SS 396
91 octane Driver n/a
6.44@105.78 1/8th mile
|
|
|