CAMARO6 - View Single Post - Procharger Post Stage 2, I.C. Temps too HOT to handle.

JoeAyalaM · 04-13-2017, 08:56 AM

The LT1 is 6.2 L, the Coyote is 5.0 L., so even with a higher redline, the Camaro should flow more air. Now about the I.C. Sizing, this is the Cooling Core Size from Procharger:

Mustangs: stage I 630 cu in., stage II 1,103 cu in.

Camaro's: stage I 432 cu in., stage II 756 cu in.

That makes both stages I.C.'s 32% smaller for the larger engine Camaro. W.T.F.? No wonder at elevation with lesser density air cooling the I.C., there are heating problems even below 7 psi.

I wonder if Procharger will step up and build us an even larger I.C. for the Camaro. I supose that is why Girly changed the I.C. in her higher boost setup.

04-13-2017, 08:56 AM	#42
JoeAyalaM Account Suspended Drives: Audi S6 V8TT, Volvos XC60 & S60R Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: 5000 ft above sea level. Posts: 414	Camaro´s VS Mustang´s Procharger I.C. Sizing The LT1 is 6.2 L, the Coyote is 5.0 L., so even with a higher redline, the Camaro should flow more air. Now about the I.C. Sizing, this is the Cooling Core Size from Procharger: Mustangs: stage I 630 cu in., stage II 1,103 cu in. Camaro's: stage I 432 cu in., stage II 756 cu in. That makes both stages I.C.'s 32% smaller for the larger engine Camaro. W.T.F.? No wonder at elevation with lesser density air cooling the I.C., there are heating problems even below 7 psi. I wonder if Procharger will step up and build us an even larger I.C. for the Camaro. I supose that is why Girly changed the I.C. in her higher boost setup.