Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverTaco07
I guess I won't get an answer. An argument was made that the 6th Gen Camaro is a fail because it looks too similar to a 5th gen, but a car that is nearly identical to one from 1970 is a winner...???
Look...I mean it's fine if you don't like the looks of a Camaro, nobody with any integrity will say that looks aren't subjective but if the metric of a good car or a "Win", is that it never looks like its predecessor, then nearly every single car in history is a fail.
I personally like the looks of the HC, GT350, ZL1...probably HC the least of the three...just not into the retro, but I get it if you are, the HC is by far best retro.
|
I guess this comment is directed at me. Your analogy is completely different from the point I made. The new generation challengers are obviously and purposefully retro. Everyone knows that. But Chevy went retro with the Camaro in the 5th gen. That car ran it's course and we moved to a 6th gen and a whole new Alpha platform. But the exterior profile remained nearly untouched. I'm not trying to offend or bash, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who expected more of a makeover when we were waiting for the 6th gen debut. Take the new generation Mustang for example. It's completely different looking from the last gen. You can't apply this to the Challenger because they have not changed generations yet.