Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryephile
There are theories based on logical fallacies, and then there are scientific conclusions based on soundly collected data. The video trumpets the prior. You getting emotional about it shows you prefer dogma over data.
This kind of anecdotal evidence is part of the problem. Unless you've done several break-in styles and then did measurements on which was most effective, your engine running well could've just as well been a result of dumb luck.
...and born-to-fish trying to use my current DD as some sort of evidence that I'm wrong is quite amusing. I challenge all of you to try out your thinking cap instead of grabbing pitchforks.
|
Wouldn't it be fair to assume the manufactures have test several break-in styles and then did measurements? Result being the break-in procedure published in the manual.