View Single Post
Old 07-01-2016, 09:48 AM   #12
ThatRedFirebird
 
Drives: 2002 Pontiac T/Am, 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovieGuy View Post
That is because of replacement cost. And it only makes sense.

Interesting thing, I just got a quote from All State. My 1999 Buick Lesabre was only a couple dollars a month different than my 16 Camaro. The bodily injury on my Buick was around $115 every six months where it was only around $20 every six on my Camaro. The Comprehensive on my Buick was $17 every six months where it was around $115 on my Camaro. So evidently they think there is a much greater chance of me being injured in my Buick than in my Camaro.
Which is fair, all newer cars are significantly safer than older cars by IIHS test standards. The SOF (small overlap) test is particularly vicious on older cars.
ThatRedFirebird is offline   Reply With Quote