|
What a stupid article.
Handicapped the Stang with 87 (I don't care what EPA ratings say). Look at those awful acceleration numbers.
Picked wrong Camaro (should have been V6)
Not apples-to-apples in tires (all-seasons vs summer)
Also had some sort of "hero" Camaro 2.0T? It was fast, or faster, than many V6's tested. Not sure how they produced those acceleration numbers. Even a fluke 0-60 shouldn't have given them the quarter mile time they pulled.
C&D's comparison of "base" pony cars was a thousand times better.
|