Maybe a visual will help explain it to some?
I totally understand and agree with those who feel MRC should not be standard equipment on the 1LE package...primarily because of SCCA regs and the general "illegal in competition racing" argument.
But I have a question for those "against" allowing MRC as an option...what in the 1LE's history or mission as a more track-capable SS makes MRC a "bad" thing? It's certainly an improvement over regular shim-valve damping (which is what we'd get...).
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrkPhx
The BCM controls the MRC and the Vette purists cried (literally) foul when GM put a SC motor in the ZO6 and were on suicide watch when they introduced a convertible. 
|
Oh, my......