Quote:
Originally Posted by 90503
The "fighting" over a visibility point only comes from some who want to throw grenades at a ship that has already sailed.
Their big ideas for the 6thGen went unheeded so now all they have left are pointless arguments requiring that what they thought best must be acknowledged by current and potential buyers, that the Camaro is not a great car, they have bought a compromised, inferior design.
Anyone who is ok with the design, visibility, etc., is dismissed as being either unenlightened, a "fan-boy" or outright lying about their preferences and lack of admission that the car and the visiblilty isn't as good as they would have built it.
No design or prototype has ever been seen of a 6thGen that satisfies the all-knowing's features that would have made it a "great car"....
And it's not just their opinion on what makes a "great car", it's that no-one acknowledges their un-used delicate genius as superior to their's.
|
Not how I see it and unthinking started it.
The complaint started when another member started a complaint about the CR review criticizing visibility. Went in to call anyone that thought visibility was important were whiners, I believe was the term.
My point was for everyone to stop trying to say every magazine is wrong and everyone on here is wrong to even suggest the Gen6 has bad visibility.
It does.
It doesn't matter that you can get used to it or adjust your mirrors or use technology. Outward, particularly rear, visibility was degraded from bad to worse.
And of course it's too late.