CAMARO6 - View Single Post

Roddy1 · 10-23-2015, 01:37 PM

I'll be shopping between the 2.0T and the 3.6 also.

If anyone is interested I think we have seen a 13.8 second 1/4 mile posted for the 2016 3.6 Camaro, while over on the ATS forums a few members have run 14.1's with their stock 2.0T ATS's and 13.5's with just a tune. So the 2.0T picks up a lot on tune only.

Also another ATS member has dyno sheets for his 2.0T with Tune and Downpipe only making 308rwhp SAE.

Just some food for thought.

10-23-2015, 01:37 PM	#47
Roddy1 Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3 Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: Canada Posts: 14	I'll be shopping between the 2.0T and the 3.6 also. If anyone is interested I think we have seen a 13.8 second 1/4 mile posted for the 2016 3.6 Camaro, while over on the ATS forums a few members have run 14.1's with their stock 2.0T ATS's and 13.5's with just a tune. So the 2.0T picks up a lot on tune only. Also another ATS member has dyno sheets for his 2.0T with Tune and Downpipe only making 308rwhp SAE. Just some food for thought.