View Single Post
Old 10-12-2015, 05:51 PM   #21
Red2014SS


 
Red2014SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 2SS/RS Camaro
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,420
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denis View Post
yea I hear what you're saying. I just think they could have sold the same car under a different name and it would have sold just fine. I feel that they revived that nameplate just for the sake of doing it to boost sales and put it onto the wrong vehicle.

I feel the same way. They've could called the current "Charger" anything else and it wouldn't have mattered. To me, a Charger should always be a RWD, 2-door, V8 powered car. The fact that they hung the name on a 4-door sedan might actually hurt sales a little... I know it's a turn off for me and, right or wrong, it's the number one thing that discourages me from ever owning one. (Yes, they did the same thing on the 1980's 4 banger... but I didn't buy one of those either.) If you're gonna resurrect a respected model name, then show it some respect.

If Chevy ever hangs the Camaro name on a 4-door, I'll never buy one.

Old man rant over.
__________________
2014 2SS/RS, L99, SW LTH w/HF Cats, GMPP Ex. Z/28 CAI, FR41s in PVD Black Chrome, Recaros, Pfadt Sway
377hp, 383tq 12.739@110.44 MPH
Red2014SS is offline   Reply With Quote