View Single Post
Old 10-06-2015, 03:11 PM   #15
huggercamaro21
Sales Manager for Chevy
 
huggercamaro21's Avatar
 
Drives: Tahoe RST
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 1,313

Quote:
Originally Posted by xgnxs View Post
You are CLEARLY forgetting that GM is a bunch of liars and that this is a ringer sent to the magazines for better reviews, the 6th gen SS will not offer real world performance anywhere close to this and will actually make 203.78 hp and 201.59 tq to the rear wheels while weighing exactly 4,357.88 lbs, WITHOUT the high performance floor mats and paint finish, of course. The mustang, on the other hand, is actually far, far superior to what literally all of the reviews of it ever have said, and it more accurately makes 526.7 hp and 543.93 tq to the rear wheels, while weighing only 2357.22 lbs, as independently verified by my source and only my source but I have no proof so don't ask but you can totally believe me. That weight is actually INCLUDING the high speed wipers and cup holders. The SS will, in REAL WORLD testing (not by magazines, of course) run the 1/4 so slowly that time will actually go backward and it will literally never finish a single road course because the brakes are so bad they literally disintegrated into nothing after only being looked at harshly, I know this because my sources tell me so, while the mustang actually finished the quarter mile so quickly that its run was only recorded by ultra high speed cameras and its time couldn't even be verified, and it actually finished every road course simultaneously, it was that fast.
huggercamaro21 is offline   Reply With Quote