[SuperSound]

Originally Posted by ChefBorOzzy

Good Lord, people.

The ZL1 was slower than the GT500 by a good margin on their best runs in a straight line. Other than that, it's a better car on the road. It's a better car if you want to do multiple laps on the track. The GT500 brakes ended up not holding up. So, what's the problem? ALl I see is Mustang people saying that Chevy's are one lap cars and suck in real world.. Well, here goes your 2 lap GT500.

The Hellcat is also fast in a straight line. It's also a better daily driver by far than a GT500. So they picked it over a ZL1. What's the problem? You can look at performance stats and pick by that or you can take subjective opinion into it as well.

That's my point. How does the Hellcat get the nod if the only thing it was better at was straight line. Hell they put the GT500 on the track for a hotlap. What did they do for the Hellcat, a point to point with baby curves and it still didn't do it any faster than the ZL1. One biased review means likely more biased reviews...but obviously they don't show bias to GM.

The Hellcat is a one trick pony compared to the ZL1 and GT500. It's absence from any sort of track day is proof of this.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk