Quote:
Originally Posted by chain777
If I read what you wrote in red, I'd say it's because Ford built a car that's about $15K cheaper than the Z/28 (the base R is the stripped out model comparable to the Z/28) that apparently out performs it?
And if your really not interested in a track oriented car, why would you care? Unless your pricing out a loaded SS and wondering if the price isn't starting to creep too close to a GT350. I know that's what I'd be thinking. Sure it's a base car, but where not talking about a stripped out car like the Z/28. It's still has all the basic creature comforts for a street car.
So I get where some people will question whether giving up some tech for more performance will be worth the trade-off. The price of a loaded SS and a base GT350 are close enough that the comparison is inevitable. It all depends on your priorities.
|
Just talking from a price performance and overall value standpoint it is unfair to compare a car with leather, premium stereo , heated and cooled seats etc to a car that doesn't. Is that stuff supposed to be free? It is 7500 dollars to add more options into the 350.
And if that's not important to someone then one should be comparing it to a 1ss not a 2ss plus even more options (which is funny cuz the thing is loaded to the gills standard)
Just saying apples to apples is how things should be looked at. And I also get what some are saying to a point...can I go without that stuff for the extra performance etc? that's fine and dandy...but don't dog the Camaro for its price at the same time and make an unfair comparison (not pointing any fingers just talking in general)