View Single Post
Old 04-04-2015, 08:23 PM   #22
HuJass

 
Drives: GM
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: CNY
Posts: 1,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by '01LS1 View Post
Probably semantics, but if you brand a car with the GTO name it has to share some sort of design progression from the memories of the buyers targeted.

Besides if retro is all that it took to capture sales, explain the Challengers low sales volume? Challenger did little to move their design forward like Camaro & Mustang & it has lagged in last place of the segment from the get go.
- In response to your first sentence, Exactly!!
And the same holds true for Camaro and Challenger. And, to a lesser degree, Mustang. The car has to be tied to the glory days of that model.

- Chrysler purposely held back production of the Challenger. They targeted it's production to be a certain small percentage of total LX production. Simple as that.
And it seems Chrysler has relaxed that a bit as they are selling way more Challengers lately; the monthly numbers are much higher than they used to be.
__________________
2015 Camaro 1LE
2009 Challenger R/T
2007 Solstice GXP
2004 Colorado ZQ8
2002 Trans Am WS6 Collector Edition
1999 Blazer
1994 Grand Prix SE B4U
HuJass is offline   Reply With Quote