Quote:
Originally Posted by sonnydurden
This is why I don't think GM should put a lot of effort into chasing HP... 3.7 secs vs 3.9 in a 0-60 isn't much difference.. But then ZL1 is better on the track.. I like the direction that GM is going in by building all around sports cars.. Performance is more than a straight line..
|
0-60 is really an antiquated measure of performance. It is typically traction limited. 1/4 mile times and trap speeds are much more useful in measuring straight line performance. The Challenger will pull noticeably harder than the ZL1, and it shows up in the 1/4 mile times. I still would take the ZL1 though.