View Single Post
Old 04-17-2014, 07:08 PM   #204
big hammer

 
Drives: 2002 ws6
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by calebparkin3 View Post
In MPGs. I'd give up a supposed mile or two for the added power the Ecoboost provides. How is ford behind yet again? For the last 4 year GMs trucks have been a joke campaired to the offerings from ford. Before that they were both on pretty even footing. GMs new lineup is now on equal footing with the current ford lineup. The exception being the new 6.2. Guess what though 2015 F150 is months away from hitting dealerships. If the rumors of weight savings are true that alone will top GMs MPGs rating. Not to mention the power trains are also going to receive some updates. So once again GMs trucks will be behind.
gm's 6.2 offers significantly more power than the EB and the same fuel economy. poor ford. always behind.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
big hammer is offline   Reply With Quote