CAMARO6 - View Single Post

LOWDOWN · 04-13-2014, 05:20 PM

If you care to compare specs, here's the GM story:

http://www.chevrolet.com/performance...gines/ls9.html

...and here's the Trinity tale:

http://www.mustangandfords.com/news/...8/viewall.html

For those concerned about me fouling the water by mentioning the Raptor 6.2, perhaps we'll share this, together, from the above article:

Nor could they move over to the bigger architecture of the 6.2 V-8 as found in the SVT Raptor. That engine is too large for the Mustang engine compartment, plus it would be prohibitively expensive to design a better breathing Four-Valve cylinder head for it, as well.

As with all things involving motorsports, "Speed costs. How fast did you wanna go?!"

04-13-2014, 05:20 PM	#159
LOWDOWN Downright Upright Drives: Daily Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Cruisin'... Posts: 4,145	If you care to compare specs, here's the GM story: http://www.chevrolet.com/performance...gines/ls9.html ...and here's the Trinity tale: http://www.mustangandfords.com/news/...8/viewall.html For those concerned about me fouling the water by mentioning the Raptor 6.2, perhaps we'll share this, together, from the above article: Nor could they move over to the bigger architecture of the 6.2 V-8 as found in the SVT Raptor. That engine is too large for the Mustang engine compartment, plus it would be prohibitively expensive to design a better breathing Four-Valve cylinder head for it, as well. As with all things involving motorsports, "Speed costs. How fast did you wanna go?!"