[LOWDOWN]

Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT

If youre looking for an argument stating the z28 is probably worth twice what a GT is, youre probably not going to find it.

OH?

Originally Posted by khell86

I dont believe anyone has every mentioned the standard Mustang GT beating the Z/28 on the track. If someone had actually stated that... anyone with common sense would know how ignorant that person is. I think the prices reflect the cars equally. A premium mustang gt running around 35k and then a z/28 running around 75k. 300k to 650k makes sense. Not to mention the z/28 is a collectors car produced in a limited quantity while the GT will be mass produced.

Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT

I get the jokes, but nobody in their right mind is comparing the new GT to tue new z/28, and if they are, it's just to rile up some reactions.

...aka "trolling"...

Originally Posted by calebparkin3

I get the jokes, but to say the marketplace of rich snobs who know nothing but how to spend money, spoke loud and clear is funny. The 1st of a very limited run of car (Z28) sold for more than a mass produced GT, does that really surprise you or anyone else?

Your butt-hurt (your words) response, I'm sure, was intended to thank those fine people for supporting worthy causes, partially through their appreciation of "things automotive"?! Thought so...

In a word, YES!

Originally Posted by trademaster

A brand new generation that will only be brand new for one year. Five years from now there may be a couple hundred fifth gen Z28s. There will be tens of thousands of these Mustang GTs running around, thousands with the exact same color and options combination. #1 of X00 of a vehicle that's already twice as expensive is much more meaningful than #1 of XX,000.

But, in BOTH cases, there'll only be ONE #1...of each...

Originally Posted by crysalis_01

It doesn't matter that the Z/28 is "just a package" on a Camaro, its initial valuation (due to it being a super limited edition) at all but double the upcoming GT's assumed price plays a huge part in this kind of thing. Think about the fact that, over say 15 years, the Z/28 will most likely retain its higher value (I'm thinking to the most synonymous car I can, the '00 R) while the GT, even #1, will devalue quite far...think how dirt cheap a 15 year old GT is worth now.

Originally Posted by 2010-1SS-IBM

Mustang owner on a Camaro forum complaining about Camaro fans. Sigh.

They're trying to teach us some SVT manners...

Originally Posted by calebparkin3

Not trolling calling it as I see it. To compare the 15 Mustang GT to the Z28 is ridiculous, and to say the mustang should have sold for closer to what the Z28 did is idiotic. The Z28 is so much more than what a regular ole Mustang GT is. For people to say it shows the Camaro is better are wrong it shows nothing besides what we already know which is the Z28 is a much more expensive desirable car. I'm not saying the Mustang is better than a Camaro or that the Camaro is better than the Mustang. I will say the Z28 is IMO a much better car than a Mustang GT of any year.

Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT

I hope Ford cancels the 6th gen because of the butt whooping it took at Barrett

Originally Posted by calebparkin3

It would only make sense for them to do that it seems

Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT

Maybe they'll release the new 6th gen [Mustang] against a Hyundai.

Well, we DO have a place, here, to refer all the nay-saying Ford folks who insist the Z/28 is a "fail" at $75K...and we sincerely thank y'all for your Ford-perspective defences of Z/28...and your continued support of the Gen-6 Mustang...

Job 1...done.