Quote:
Originally Posted by willhe64
Lol, I knew there would be at least on high horse rider on the high road to spout off. Thank you Deki, now run along, there is way too much bad grammar on the internet for you to correct today.
Aaaaand, he drives a Mustang, perfect.
|
You're going to lecture me on being a high horse rider for not supporting you and your idiot friend damaging someone's truck? Wow...fist of all, the guy obviously did it on accident, otherwise he wouldn't have left his truck there. Second of all, he did not damage anything, unlike you and your friend. So before you bring up the fact that I drive a Mustang, which has nothing to do with anything, or you talk to me about me being a high horse rider, maybe you need to look into being a decent human being and not doing something ILLEGAL to someone intentionally just because they accidentally ALMOST damaged something of yours. What do you want me to say? Way to go BRO, you showed that old man with an old truck who's boss by being a jackass.....grow up. And frankly, I'm surprised by some of the comments in here, really makes me think the average age of a Camaro owner is 15.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisBlair
I don't have a dog in this fight, for starters
But in reading your reply, I am intrigued. So you feel that filling the guy's exhaust with expanding foam was "wrong".
OK, I'm with you, I can follow the logic.
Then you say that the person that filled the pipe with foam should get a beating.
Here's where you lose me: physical assault is OK, but damage to the vehicle is not? How does that add up?  |
It's intentional vs. unintentional here. Yeah the guy in the old truck is an ass hat, but does he deserve to have his vehicle damaged for being a bad driver? Or old? Or handicapped? We don't know why he did what he did, but we do know that he didn't cause any damage. Then OP and his friend go inside the store, buy foam, and spray it in this guy's exhaust, just to be pricks. If you came out and saw someone damaging your car for no reason, what would you do? I don't think he is saying physical assault is ok. What I think he means is that an intentional bad act deserves retaliation, in this case, a punk who damages someone's property get a whoopin'. Seems fair to me.