Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Wyndham
I'm afraid gunning for both will water down the effectiveness of the design too much. The only "easy" solution I can think of that won't kill the design would be to work for a lower belt line, and try hard to skinny up the A-pillars on the 6th-gen. This improves visibility, but keep the shoulders, and the chopped roof for their aggressive value.
Luckily Tom Peters is darn near a genius with design - and I'm confident they'll address as much of the convenience stuff as they can without loosing any of the Camaro's visual potency. I look at the new Corvette and find hope. 
Does it? I checked the fuel efficiency tab under ATS, and couldn't find anything that said 22/32? Where'd you see it? |
Cadillac website - buid your own and compare, then click the Fuel Economy tab to compare any car. I compared RWD 2.5, 2.0T and 3.6