View Single Post
Old 12-05-2012, 06:48 PM   #239
ChrisBlair
Buick 455 Fan
 
Drives: 1970 Buick, 2012 1SS LS3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 5,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlingShot View Post
Our Sky Red line with the GMPP tune would eat out LLT hands down, and would even give our SS a good run. Never under estimate the 2.0T engines, GM knows how to build them right.
I had an '07 Sol GXP with the GMPP tune on my LNF 2.0L turbo. 2 liters, 290 bhp, 340 lb/ft, and the engine was not peaky at all

And I agree, my GXP would give my 1SS a run for it's money. Power to weight is very similar, and there's actually a fatter powerband over a larger area 'under the curve' with the GM tuned LNF. I make more torque in the LS3, but truth be told, my LNF generated usuable torque faster at low rpms. My big complaint about my Camaro SS is that my turbo LNF had better throttle response under 3K rpm; then again there's better tech in the LNF than an LS3

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBoomKid View Post
Turbos will lose boost after 50K miles. The bottomline turbocharged engines are not high mileage engines never have been. We have older F150 and 1500 trucks with 100's of thousands miles on them. The new ones will never match them. I can't understand why anyone would go out and buy a turbocharged 4 cyc.truck, it'll be fine for a short period, yet nolonger will it be the best selling vehicle in America.
Couple things:

-There's no law that says that at 50K "turbos loose boost". Mine didn't.
-That's a truck application, not a lighter weight car appilcation
-It's not 1980 any more; the tech is here to make durable turbo engines
__________________
ChrisBlair is offline   Reply With Quote