[mgaspari]

Originally Posted by camarostar2010

I will be real honest on this from all angles. The truth is this. I know because I know...lets leave it at that. An officer issuing a summons...CAN NOT EVER...unless a crime is being committed, stand in the way, block, or physically detain a driver. the only way you can be detained is if you are under arrest. Hence why the founding fathers made the constitution. He was illegally detained by that cop. Also the cop willfully placed his foot and body in front of the car. The driver tried to move around him. he never ran over the cops foot.. The cop was supposed issue the summons...what is called an n.o.v Notice of violation. and he was supposed to mail it to the owner of the vehicle. That's all he can do and was supposed to do. At which point the owner or driver can appear before the kangaroo court magistrate and make a plea. NOW....was it wise to approach the vehicle and try to leave, no. I would have just let the ticket be written and deal with it then...or in my case I could talk to him, and ask that he have some courtesy. Either way I would not approach the ofc. with any rebuke or anger. Why risk that confrontation for chump money. NOW ..the verdict. Speaking arbitrarily, the cop, one illegally detained a civilian by using his own body as a shield. Two illegally attacked the motorist by dragging him out the car and flipping him. The driver did not resist arrest nor committed any thing to even be arrested. three...created undo damage to the motorist veh and the cab near the veh by slamming the doors. Property damage isnt covered here. Four arresting now the civilian without any real assault committed or any other crime. Offcourse, the ofc will say he was attacked and the car was used a deadly weapon. Which the vid, easily can exonerate. Whether the guy is a rich watever, or ****y etc..is null an void. The offfcer must uphold the law and be the bigger man. Instead his ego got the best of him, and he used excessive force and illegal detention as a way out. Now all 3 ofc their will have to write fraudulent lies to corroborate the initial cops version...hence they all will lie before the judge to cover His, the initial cops, wrong doing. the blue wall...again. So now if and only if this vid is admitted as evidence can this senseless rich idiot be exonerated. So he loses ...because the lawyer fees and all that far exceed the ticket. BUT...BUT...with a good lawyer u can recover all the fee plus damages, and the p.o. might be out of a j.o.b. ..time will tell

THIS!

Originally Posted by ardailsmith

What...... how do you come to this conclusion. using your logic, It would be OK for a bank robber to shoot a cop as long as the cop is between him and the exit.

The driver was way out of line had it been in L.A. he might of gotten a Rodney King beat down or Nor-Cal they might have just handcuffed him then shoot him in the back. This guy is lucky he's white because he was two shades from getting his ass kicked.

no clue what your talking about with a bank robber and cop lol to be brutally honest, i think what hes said ^^^ is what i was getting at.