Quote:
Originally Posted by BackinBlackSS/RS
Are you freaking kidding me? They had visual confirmation of what this SOB did. He admitted earlier in 1998 that he had touched boys inappropriately. What more do they need? They had every reason to sever ties with him, but yet they did not. This is not a he said/he said case which would have been a totally different situation. The GA saw what he did.
|
Ok, I've been completely calm and rational in all of my responses. I would appreciate the same in return.
However, think about it for 1 second. You have an alumnus and 30+ year employee who up until this had done nothing (that you know of officially, nowhere does it say that the university police, local police, and the DA told the administration) to ever sully the reputation of PSU.
Then you receive this report on the eye witness report of 1 person. They then ban this person from the football facilities and revoke his keys and ban him from ever bringing children from his charity to the campus anymore or using the campus for those types of events. All very appropriate measures. The fact that they didn't immediately run out and paint over a mural does not bother me.
Would you like the supreme court to remove the statue of Muhammed? Would you like all the refineries in the United States to pull the valves they have from the 1933 era Germany which are all stamped and emblazoned with Swastikas? How does this affect the operation of the refinery? How does that painting affect the function of the building?
I've been to the stadium and never even noticed the mural. Is it in the office area? Is it visible to the public?