View Single Post
Old 09-15-2011, 06:45 AM   #44
Rogue Leader
Iatefiberglassinsulation
 
Rogue Leader's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5thGenOwner View Post
First line of the article reads...

"OnStar Inc. President Chris Preuss is directing a group to study business opportunities from which his company might reap additional revenues..."

Later in the article they specifically mention insurance companies, my earlier quote. I would guess insurance companies would definately be the biggest additional revenue they could get. (they even approached Onstar, they want it so bad)

I think the difference in the wording between the disclosure and the article is semantics. They did the studies, saw opportunities, and now are executing them.

Heres the sticking point. Many people are going to automatically believe that the "insurance" part means that they are watching you. Or if you get in a wreck that the first thing they are gonna do is call OnStar and say "how fast was he going"? but in reality that is likely not the case.

OnStar's usage data goes into a database and can be extrapolated into any number of statistics. These statistcs are HUGELY valuable to insurance companies. They can tell where people are driving more, where crashes happen more often (remember Insurer's data is only where they have policies in force and claims, so if theres an area of your state that theres not a lot of policies, their data is low there), average speeds in areas. Having worked for one of the major insurance companies this data is GOLD to them as it allows them to be ultra competitive in an area while still pricing to maintain a profit.

Is it theoretically possible that State Farm can call them up and say "How fast was Bob Jones going at 5:15 PM on Wednesday", I'm sure anything is possible, but this scenario sounds highly unlikely, and based upon the exact words in their disclosure the only thing you really would need to worry about is law enforcement, and I would bet thats only in criminal case proceedings. They don't have time to call OnStar about your fender bender, they have bigger fish to fry.

When it comes to Criminal Cases, I'd hope none of us ever have that issue anyway

Now I'm gonna put my flame jacket on for the onslaught of replies that tell me I'm an idiot, I don't know what I'm talking about, OnStar and the government is out to get us all, the insurance companies are out to get us all, and my tin-foil hat must be defective.
__________________
2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS - was daily driver, now toy
2020 Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio - Daily Driver
2017 Mercedes Benz GLE 350 - Wifes Car
2008 Chevy Silverado 2500 HD LT 6.0 - Tow Vehicle
1991 Alfa Romeo 164S - Project Car
1994 Volkswagen Golf - Race Car

"Like" my race team on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/farfrumwinnin
Rogue Leader is offline