CAMARO6 - View Single Post

SleepWarz · 08-26-2011, 06:39 PM

I came to COD from BF1942, but played both equally. at that time COD's Superior infantry combat made it more enjoyable due to the horrible infantry combat in 1942. BF has been improving, which CANNOT be said for COD. Each cod title is becoming more of a POS than the last. Hopefully they can work out the STUPID freaking grenade physics in BF. I've been tired of throwing wiffle balls that dont even follow a predictable pattern. Conversly, COD's nades are way better but the maps ruin them because of set nades on every snd map. EVERY cod that had vehicles blew donkey balls when they were used.

The highlights of both series was DESERT COMBAT for BF1942 and COD/UO when you disabled the vehicles.

DC had way better helicopter flight mechanics than bf2.

08-26-2011, 06:39 PM	#29
SleepWarz Banned Drives: 1991 New Yorker, 69 Tbird, ABM2SSRS Join Date: May 2009 Location: BC Canada Posts: 2,248 View My Garage	I came to COD from BF1942, but played both equally. at that time COD's Superior infantry combat made it more enjoyable due to the horrible infantry combat in 1942. BF has been improving, which CANNOT be said for COD. Each cod title is becoming more of a POS than the last. Hopefully they can work out the STUPID freaking grenade physics in BF. I've been tired of throwing wiffle balls that dont even follow a predictable pattern. Conversly, COD's nades are way better but the maps ruin them because of set nades on every snd map. EVERY cod that had vehicles blew donkey balls when they were used. The highlights of both series was DESERT COMBAT for BF1942 and COD/UO when you disabled the vehicles. DC had way better helicopter flight mechanics than bf2.