Quote:
Originally Posted by Milk 1027
I disagree. Show me where this is true. I've played several games on both consoles and the same games look either better or the same on the 360. Plus playing the same game, loading times are so much faster on the 360 and updates don;t take hours like they do for the PS3.
I'm not a fanboy, I play both consoles equally, but the PS3 is mainyl my movie watcher, and it's not even that great of a blu ray player. I've seen several blu ray players for approximately the same price that are just plain better than the PS3 with dvd's.
Both consoles have their ups and downs. This conversation is the same as the Mustang vs Camaro, and Apple vs Microsoft arguments.
|
I agree that most games look similar graphics wise but I also explained why that is. Compare a PS3 exclusive game designed on the console and then compare it with the xbox game of your choosing and there's no comparison graphics wise. It's not a snipe at xbox, it's fact. When the game is designed on xbox then it's designed to the best of it's capabilities and then formatted for other systems but not gone over to give it the boost it should get for the systems that can handle boundlessly more.
It is fact that anyone who bought the PS3 or especially the PC versions of MW2 could have been enjoying more game for their money but xbox is not capable so the rest of us lose out. It sucks when you buy the best console there is only to have the games dictated by the lesser one. It's not even PS3 vs xbox as much as it is that xbox users should want more out of their systems. xbox players should have been pissed when MW2 was shot down cause of it. Even a little kids game like Little Big Planet was too much for it!! That's sad but it's also indicatory.
Also I would hope that a blue ray player that did nothing but play discs would be better then a PS!! That's all it has to do
