View Single Post
Old 05-06-2011, 05:23 PM   #72
Slick1
New Guy
 
Slick1's Avatar
 
Drives: Black 2011 1SS.
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: DE
Posts: 509
Some of you guys aren't going to like this but here's the deal.

PS3 graphics are better without a doubt. The ONLY reason xbox can even come close to PS3's graphics are because the games are being produced on xbox.

The ONLY reason the games are produced on xbox is because then they don't have to make more then 1 version. If the games were modeled using PS3's true capabilities the xbox couldn't handle it and the games would have to be dumbed down to play on it. Plain and simple the xbox is holding the PS3 and gaming back and developers are saying the same thing. MW2 would have had a TEN HOUR story mode but xbox couldn't handle it so they cut it down. PS3 and PC lost out because the retarded brother of the gaming world couldn't keep up.

It's simple. If you want the best gaming console available you go and buy a PS3, if you just want to play games then you get the box.

Also I don't know how true it is since psn got hacked and live stayed up but I had always heard that xbox rented their servers from Sony and that's why the box paid for online.

I'm not against xbox users or fans at all but it really does piss me off to hear a developer say something along the lines of "well we wanted to do this but it's not compatible across the systems so we couldn't". It's not right to lose out because of an obsolete or inferior product. I can't imagine how PC gamers must feel because they could handle way more then the box and PS3 combined and have to get watered down versions of games due to the consoles.
Slick1 is offline   Reply With Quote