Quote:
Originally Posted by rlg3
your right its not elementary school in any work place their are policy and procedures and employee discipline is given out based on harm done to the company or potential harm. So it does matter. If there was harm done to GM then he should be fired if there was no harm or minor harm it should be handle in manner consistent with the level of harm or lack of harm.
Why won't anyone say what the harm, was? Is that cause there was no harm?
|
Short and sweet:
Dealerships are under contract with GM. GM has rules dealerships must follow. Not following these rules is BAD. If something says dealership guide, not for public distribution, you shouldn't give it to the public. It's their company, so it's their reason. This was to give dealers a HEADS UP for questions, because the CONSUMER version will be out (so I'm told) Friday. What ends up in the CONSUMER edition, they like to be as factual as possible. GM has their reasons. And yes, the magic poster later in the day with 1 post count posted he got his emailed from a dealer in Florida.
So, when you run a dealership selling GM products, you should really follow GM's advice on how they want things done. This isn't new for any dealership, but with salesmen turning over like weeds, it's up to dealership management to make these employee's aware of DO's and DON'TS.
The guide in July was also given out by a BILL HEARD employee and scanned - then posted on this forum (so the original poster stated). There was a similar situation, not to this scale, but that to me was a warning. Maybe some weren't here WAY BACK THEN in July.
What if the Colonel Sander's shared his recipe with employees years ago? They wouldn't be here.
Orders start on the 13th. Lets focus on the car
