Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323
Yea those skirts will probably be replaced or painted when I get mine. I was debating going camaro if it was as light as people claimed. But now that I know it is as much as a pig as the challenger, I ordered a 09 challenger because IMO it looks better than the camaro. The camaro looks great but they gave it more lines because it lacks in size. I am talking about muscle car look, it lacks in size. I saw the concept a year ago at an auto show and the camaro turned me off the minute I saw it's size. I know most of you will say well it makes it lighter, but to me big car +big engine=muscle. The camaro is going to be a great car and will beat me car stock and will gain more hp per mod due to lack of aftermarket for the hemi. But I just love the retro look of the challenger and If the tailights of the camamro weren't so fugly (they tried too hard to make it look like the vette) than I would certainly be getting a camaro.:seesaw:
|
look kevin!!! those 300-400lbs you overlooked would like a word with you!!
(300-400lbs)
As for the reason(s) i dont like the challenger.
a. its built on a sedan platform. we saw this on the charger... which is why the charger is more of a rental car than a muscle car.
b. the thing is a whale. i dont know whether to start it up, or harpoon the thing.
c. its height. being an overly LONG car is one thing, but this car stands too high. it gives off a, im a showcar, not a car to be driven seriously, look.
d. the interior. if i was blindfolded and led into the car, only to be shown the interior. i wouldnt know which dodge i was sitting in. try confusing the interior on a camaro.
e. did i mention its a heffer?
f. the back lights. as cool as i THOUGHT they were in pictures, only parts of the lights even light up. its like, half of them were false imitations of black lights.
g. the fake carbon fiber stripes. on a 42k dollar car. seriously?