|
[QUOTE=Enslaved;11500932]You weren't too far off.
540hp/537tq on a Dynapak setup.
No changes made during the session, just back to back runs.
She was running a bit rich. Boost crept higher than I expected, but I have read that it's common. Tune by Ted (JRE) remotely and only on the street. Not too bad for what it is. Repeatable, IAT's seem reasonable and lots of area under the curve. Funny little dip towards the end of the curve, not sure what that's about.
Anyways, it certainly feels like it's got more in it, but I'll defer to Ted when we talk next week.
================================================== =======================
Great! This leads to the conclusion that HP Tuners logs provide an excellent prediction of what can be expected on the Dyno. The Torque results seen on the Dyno in your measurement are only 2.5% off (lower...) compared to the HP Tuners .hpl.
Would be interesting to get such validation (or refute) from others who logged torque and dynamic MAF / Airflow and compared to the dyno results during the same run.
|