View Single Post
Old 04-30-2025, 04:03 PM   #15
FlukeSS

 
FlukeSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 Camaro 2SS A10
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Here
Posts: 1,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbSS View Post
I actually had this one on my H/C/FBO/e85 1LE, and I love the way it looks (and got a lot of compliments, because it's different than the typical open filter look). I swapped to JLT 5" (required re-tune) only because it's easier to maintain after track days (which suck up a lot of insects and twigs out here in the desert).

Anyways, I gained a whopping 3rwhp and 4rwtq I bet most of that was due to also having slightly higher ethanol content. I was 65% with the CAI, and around 75% when I re-tuned with JLT.

But I agree with the previous poster. The CAI debates are laughable, the stock airbox is in no way a restriction and the rotofab cultists are cringe. Keep in mind these dyno comparisons are with no heat soak and open hood, and if they show any good gains it's likley because of the tune they didn't mention.
But But, I only did Rofofab to reduce IAT's. As opposed to the leaky af K&N that I was using.

I'm not a cultist am I?
__________________
2020 Camaro 2SS A10 | Rebuilt by: CBI Street Cars | 2" SE LT Headers | 3" SE X-Pipe | 3" MBRP Axle-Back | Pri & Sec Cat Deletes | Roto-Fab CAI | LT2 Ported | 95mm ZR1 TB | LSA crankshaft conversion w/modified crank gear | LS1 thrust bearing | Gen V Hinson Plug Wire Set | BTR 220 Stage I Cam | ARP Rod Bolts | Delphi Lifter set | NGK LTR6IX-11 spark plug set | DOD Delete | VVT Limiter | ECM, TCM & E85 | Retuned by: Justin L. | Dyno: 510 rwhp 472 rwtq | Best 1/4 Time: 11.639
FlukeSS is offline   Reply With Quote