Quote:
Originally Posted by dreksnot
So, am I to presume neither is better or worse than the other? There are nuisances with each. For someone like me who desires a reliable, safe 800-850whp without cracking open the motor for a cam or heads, either would work fine without breaking a sweat. Add supporting low side and PI fuel supply for full E85 and go! Would I need headers (w/ hi flow cats here)? Would a 103mm TB do fine? A 120mm sure sounds like less restriction but wouldn’t that make idle/cruise tuning more difficult?
Guess I do have to mention, I’d like actual 800-850whp hitting the pavement (not SAE sea level corrected) but I’m at altitude. If I dyno’d now I’d be around 460whp so there’s a nice stretch in numbers to get there. Still possible with what I’ve mentioned as to how I’d like to get there?
|
Both the 3.0 and 2650 can make 800-850 WHP without breaking a sweat… Headers and high flow cats will help keep the boost number down. 103mm TB is fine, nothing to be gained with a 112/120 TB at that level. Over 1K WHP is a different story though.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
|