[dreksnot]

Originally Posted by KingLT1

If we consider the dyno correction factor, the results will show a much higher number than actual. So I wouldn't be surprised if he hits 75-800whp on full E because the power number will be inflated 20%. Reality is that setup is only going to make ~650whp uncorrected at that elevation. I do think the 2650 makes sense here since the blower will need to be spun much harder to make power.

So, I actually want 800hp to the ground, so it would be a corrected 960whp at sea level (although I wouldn't plan to go down there to see). I hate this altitude correction factor thing because it always seems to confuse the results when in discussions. I've been told 91 octane burns up here like 93 does at sea level. Less air (oxygen) to use for combustion sucks.

What I need is more air. More air equates to more power with fueling. In essence, I have to push a larger volume of air into the motor to make the same power as down low, hence the 1.20 correction factor.

Might just have to bite the bullet: install the 2650 for maybe 50-75hp add for now or just have it in the box on the shelf in the garage. Hurry up and wait for when Steck gets that PI system out (Atlas?), install that with a higher volume LPFP and FF. Then that removes the fueling constraints up to 1,000whp or so, and is actually less costly.