View Single Post
Old 04-03-2023, 07:51 AM   #153
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjperformance View Post
Everything is done. Added in the terminals to the AEM wideband, fixed up the tunes according to the info provided between this thread, THPSI's videos, and Radz28s thread.

I ended up going the route of removing PE and adding back to MAF, and adding to the EQ Torque table as Mike described.

If anyone knows the proper way to save a log in Tuner Pro let me know, because I thought I exported a log, but now I can't find one. So no eye candy to show anyone, and nothing to analyze from my run any more.

Before I closed the log though, I did look at the log, and things looked pretty well on track. The Reflex was correcting for fueling a little bit (couple percent) which is great. Verifies that is working. I'll need to grab another log though before I can make any actual adjustments.

Was worried about the torque model adjustments, but trans seems to be shifting okay, still chirping the tires a little... overall, I think I just need to practice dialing in the fueling based on reflex logs.

Once I'm comfortable with that, then I can try some full E, check things out again, then probably put that 3.7" pulley on with EXTRA peace of mind that the reflex and lambda feedback will help me keep from blowing things up on the first couple of pulls.
AWESOME NEWS!!!

I had an opportunity to run the signal wire from the cabin over to the REFLEX controller this weekend, but didn't connect it otherwise because of other OCD things, lol. That's great to see it working and doing it's thing.

I MIGHT be coming close to a conclusion soon. I've had to polish some stuff in my E92 tune that I hadn't noticed before that I think has been, influencing the REFLEX, but believe I'm on track now. I've also noticed that in messing with my E92-side that the "good" control over the low-side has diminished a little from earlier tunes. I'm pretty sure that was because I changed the "positive" adjustments for the DSX, trying to find what I wanted for the E92-MAF, and I just need to put that back. Anyways - it's encouraging I think, and MIGHT still be an alternative, for anyone that it matters enough to try. Mike's way is already proven though, so knowing that is relieving.

It seems to me, that if it at least feels like it's shifting as good, or better, than before, it seems like you might be heading in the right direction. I added TQ for my E85 tables to be "safe", but I'm already commanding enough pressure it probably doesn't matter anyways. I DO know that those tables DO influence the transmission control though. It is definitely noticeable.
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote