Quote:
Originally Posted by cjperformance
To clarify, is the alternate method just pulling fuel from PE, and leaving the MAF alone except to fine tune once PE adjustments get things close to desired eqr on the wideband?
|
In the method I'm trying, I am, essentially, telling the ECM the DI injectors flow less (by, theoretically the same amount I'm compensating with the PI injectors). It doesn't seem like the table I'm doing this in is pretty general, and polishing with the PE table will help with that fidelity. And it sounds like once a good IPW is locked in, then I'll see about final polishing methods, like adjusting the REFLEX MAF curve to calibrate with the PI injectors. So - all of that to say: leaving the E92 MAF curve alone, adjusting the E92 fueling, and allow the REFLEX to make up for the difference, and get that EQ on the wideband in a safe range. So - yes - I think we are on the same page
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP374
Ok well that makes me feel better. Looking fwd to the upcoming info.
I’m using FIC +30’s, 38% fuel lobe cam, Fore in tank setup. No meth, e60, holding 5.2MS @ .84 lamda. Inj duty cycle 28%. Just under 900 whp.
|
I'm hoping this works out. I've tried to see if there's information, regarding this method, out there on HPTuners' forum, but I got no responses. Obviously - tuning is a big business, and I get that, and while the common compensation (I guess you'd say that?) method out there works fine, it seems like a lot more balancing and "raping" that MIGHT be necessary, if this method works out. We'll see
I'd also recommend anyone who's interested, to go through Greg's threads (all of the related ones) and to also focus on Mike's comments. There's a lot of information to unpack and think about, that are helping me along, too. They were especially helpful in finding a model to base plumbing from. Seeing how the fuel needs to flow correctly was a great help, because I would have never figured it out with the threads and Mike's videos.