[Joshinator99]

Originally Posted by radz28

I think I was thinking along those lines, and that's how I think I interpreted a lot, of at least, with what Mike posted. Maybe I have unfounded worries with the Virtual Torque system and I wouldn't suggest I have mine optimized (mostly as close as I can get it anyways, lol), but I'm fully conscious that it needs to be as optimized as possible. I have it good enough I don't have throttle closure/weirdness or timing retard or anything.

I've been reading posts about methanol set-ups and seeing how that's done, and it seems like I can also massage PE lower, and then add the torque back in VTT, which I'm familiar enough with. I'm not necessarily interested in the easiest as much as most effective I guess. That's until I can't get anywhere with effective, then regress to easiest, because that's what I'm capable of, lol.

Thanks, gents', for your comments though!

CHEERS!!!

I was chatting with my local tuner who’s a pretty sharp dude (Josh Pearl of Performance Dyno, Louden NH) and he said it was pretty easy to square away on a dyno. You can adjust the MAF as needed and try tweaking the VT tables as a starting point, but the dyno would tell you how much torque the car was actually making. So he said it would be easy to correlate what the dyno said and what your ECU thought it was making. You could then adjust the VT to compensate. Sounded easy… famous last words lol!